1 edition of Reconceptualising deterrence found in the catalog.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
|Series||Routledge global security studies|
|LC Classifications||JZ6009.M628 L54 2012|
|The Physical Object|
|ISBN 10||9780415682138, 9780203100370|
|LC Control Number||2012007778|
Building Criminal Capital vs Specific Deterrence: The Effect of Incarceration Length on Recidivism David S. Abrams December, Abstract In evaluating the efficacy of most modern criminal justice systems, a vital relationship to understand is that between incarceration length (and likelihood) and recidivism. Because. Nuclear deterrence is the threat of nuclear retaliation for a proscribed behavior, generally an attack upon the threatening state. The theory of nuclear deterrence posits that such threat, if perceived as real and likely to cause sufficient devastation, will prevent an attack or other proscribed behavior from occurring.
Theory and application in English language teaching
The pearl and the pumpkin
The saint who fought the dragon
greatest gift of them all.
Precious Moments Friends Forever (Golden Storybooks)
Using the Bible with audio-visuals.
On the Bloch-Landau constant for schlicht functions
evaluation model to select an integrated learning system in a large, suburban school district
Murder through the looking glass
new television, a public/private art
Total quality management for the food industries
Tropical forest community ecology
This book offers a reconceptualisation Reconceptualising deterrence book conventional deterrence theory, and applies it to enduring rivalries in the Middle East. The work argues that many of the problems encountered in the development of deterrence theory lay in the fact that it was developed during the Cold War, when the immediate problem it had to address was how to prevent catastrophic nuclear wars.
Cited by: 4. The book also accents the significance of reconceptualising the theory of deterrence in a non-western, non-nuclear context and locating it beyond the Cold War paradigm. In this regard, one crucial aspect that can be picked up from the book is its understanding of the phenomenon of reconciliation between stability and credibility in situations.
In this book, Freedman charts the evolution of the contemporary concept of deterrence, and discusses whether – and how – it still has relevance in today’s world.
He considers constructivist as well as realist approaches and draws on criminological as well as strategic studies literature to develop a concept of a norms-based, as opposed to 5/5(3).
Reconceptualizing Deterrence Theory: Stafford & Warr; Jenn W. • 12 cards. specific deterrence * for particular offender * direct exp with punishment. general deterrence * for others * indirect exp with punishment. punishment Reconceptualising deterrence book * ppl who avoid punishment for their crime.
As a concept, deterrence has launched a thousand books and articles. It has dominated Western strategic thinking for more than four decades. In this important and groundbreaking new book, Lawrence Freedman develops a distinctive approach to the evaluation of deterrence as both a state of mind and a strategic option.
This approach is applied to post-cold war crisis. Review – Reconceptualising Deterrence. Sanjeev Kumar, Mar 3Features. Before you download your free e-book, please consider donating to support open access publishing.
E-IR is an independent non-profit publisher run by an all volunteer team. Your donations allow us to invest in new open access titles and pay our bandwidth bills to.
Reconceptualising Deterrence This is where I propose that deterrence theory ought to be reconceptualised. Armed forces have always existed, in as much as there have been political units (whether states, kingdoms, empires, tribes etc) and these political units have worried about their survival and security.
Short, insightful, and well written. You can't ask for much more from a book on international political theory. Published inDeterrence addresses the theory of deterrence as it was shortly the United States invaded Iraq, animated by the alternative idea of pre-emption.
Freedman is not beholden to a single theory of international relations unlike many other scholars in his field/5. Neither deterrence nor rational choice theory is a general or complete model of criminal behavior. The central concepts and propositions in each-fear of legal punishment in deterrence theory and the reward/cost balance (or expected Reconceptualising deterrence book function) in ra- tional choice theory-are subsumable under the more general dif- Cited by: Book Description.
Deterrence is a theory which claims that punishment is justified through preventing future crimes, and is one of the oldest and most powerful theories about punishment. The argument that punishment ought to secure crime reduction occupies a central place in criminal justice policy and is the site for much debate.
Should the. Deterrence in relation to criminal offending is the idea or theory that the threat of punishment will deter people from committing crime and reduce Reconceptualising deterrence book probability and/or level of offending in is one of five objectives that punishment is thought to achieve; the other four objectives are denunciation, incapacitation (for the protection of society), retribution and Reconceptualising deterrence book.
The authors argue that this widely accepted conception of general and specific deterrence has serious shortcomings. It rests on faulty logic and has done little to clarify the deterrence process. The reconceptualization proposed by the authors suggests that it is unnecessary to formulate separate theories of general and specific deterrence.
Elli Lieberman is an Adjunct Professor in Political Science at the University of Maryland Baltimore County and Loyola University Maryland. His research examines the rudiments of deterrence theory in order to increase our understanding of how it works so it could become a reliable tool of statecraft against states, rogue actors, and terrorist organizations.
deterrence theory is correct, then to reduce crime, the correctional system should be orga-nized to maximize the pain of crime and to minimize its benefits.
Its whole aim should be to scare people straight—those who have engaged in crime (specific deterrence) and those who are thinking about committing crime (general deterrence). Understanding Deterrence Michael J.
Mazarr. 2 potential aggressor, including its theory of deterrence (taking into account what it values and why). In the process, as will be argued, history strongly suggests that aggressor motivations are varied andFile Size: KB.
Deterrence theory says that people will obey the law if the punishment is swift, certain and severe. It has been used to explain why a higher certainty of getting caught reduces the incidences of.
Deterrence theory is the idea that an inferior force, by virtue of the destructive power of the force's weapons, could deter a more powerful adversary, provided that this force could be protected against destruction by a surprise attack. This doctrine gained increased prominence as a military strategy during the Cold War with regard to the use of nuclear weapons and is related to, but.
The idea that punishment requires some sort of justification is because it is seen to involve some of infliction of suffering or pain (Bentham,p 45) and as a result can only truly be justified if its consequences are deemed to be beneficial (Bentham,p 45).
Last month the Modern War Institute convened a conference with more than sixty government, academic, business, and military leaders to discuss “Deterrence in the 21 st Century.” Central to all discussions was the deterrence theory laid out in Thomas Schelling’s Arms and it is with great sadness that we say farewell to Schelling, who passed away.
Read "Reconceptualising Arms Control Controlling the Means of Violence" by available from Rakuten Kobo. The theory and practice of arms control seemed to have its heyday during the height of the Cold War, with its focus on t Brand: Taylor And Francis. Learn deterrence theory with free interactive flashcards.
Choose from 95 different sets of deterrence theory flashcards on Quizlet. Newly revised in the light of the renewed debate of the last five years, this second edition of Patrick Morgan's book is a comprehensive review of the logic and the practice of deterrence.
Morgan highlights the difficulties involved in immediate deterrence, the use of threat to deter in a specific, immediate situation.
He then explores the irrationality of the strategic options that. Unfortunately, this book can't be printed from the OpenBook. If you need to print pages from this book, we recommend downloading it as a PDF. Visit to get more information about this book, to buy it in print, or to download it as a free PDF.
Deterrence is about much more than merely threatening an adversary. It must be conceived primarily as an effort to shape the thinking of a potential aggressor. Any strategy to prevent aggression must begin with an assessment of the potential.
Rethinking The Deterrence Theory Criminology Essay. words (17 pages) Essay in Criminology. 5/12/16 Criminology Reference this Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work produced by our Essay Writing Service.
Reconceptualising Penality: A Comparative Perspective on Punitiveness in Ireland, Scotland and New Zealand Claire Hamilton. Drastic increases in the use of imprisonment; the introduction of 'three strikes' laws and mandatory sentences; restrictions on parole - all of these developments appear to signify a new, harsher era or 'punitive turn.
Deterrence is the prevention of something, especially war or crime, by having something such as weapons or punishment to use as a threat. policies of nuclear deterrence. Synonyms: prevention, obstruction, inhibition, hindrance More Synonyms of deterrence.
A Cognitive Theory of Deterrence. March ; Journal of The new model of military deterrence put forth unearths a set of conditions that are. Other articles where Deterrence is discussed: tort: Deterrence: In its modern, economic sense, deterrence aims at reducing the number of accidents by imposing a heavy financial cost on unsafe conduct.
A distinction is necessary between specific and general deterrence. The former depends largely on the admonitory effect of tort law. This, however. This book argues that current research is unable to find strong cases of deterrence success, because it uses a flawed research design which does Location: Owings Mills, Maryland.
Deterrence in Criminal Justice Evaluating Certainty vs. Severity of Punishment Valerie Wright, Ph.D. November This report was written by Valerie Wright, Ph.D., Research Analyst at The Sentencing Project.
The Sentencing Project is a national non-profit organization engaged in research and advocacy on criminal justice policy issues. File Size: KB. Post-Cold War Conflict Deterrence examines the meaning of deterrence in this new environment and identifies key elements of a post-Cold War deterrence strategy and the critical issues in devising such a strategy.
It further examines the significance of these findings for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. Finally, the book examines the utility. The Concept Of Deterrence Is Fundamental To The Success Of A System Of Regulatory Sanctions, But Ensuring Optimal Deterrence Is Very Difficult. The aim of this essay is to firstly analyse the concept of deterrence from an economic perspective.
Consideration will then be given to whether the deterrence approach will always lead to success by. THE DETERRENCE CONCEPT IN CRIMINOLOGY AND LAW JOHN C. BALL The author is a Ford Fellow and Research Assistant in Sociology in Vanderbilt University at Nashville, Tennessee.
He lays bare some evidence of loose thinking in criminology. Ball acknowledges his indebtedness to Dr. Albert J. Reiss, Jr., and to Dr. Immediately download the Deterrence summary, chapter-by-chapter analysis, book notes, essays, quotes, character descriptions, lesson plans, and more - everything you need for studying or teaching Deterrence.
What is General Deterrence Theory. § “.assertions about deterrence are virtually meaningless unless they refer to specific properties of punishment.”3 § Policy must define the actual punishment that will be imposed 3(Gibbs, ) 7File Size: KB.
The concept of nuclear deterrence is seriously flawed, and it violates the fundamental ethical principles of all major religions. Besides being morally unacceptable, nuclear weapons are also illegal according to a historic decision of the International Court of Justice, a ruling that reflects the opinion of the vast majority of the.
Learn deterrence criminology with free interactive flashcards. Choose from 43 different sets of deterrence criminology flashcards on Quizlet.
Testing Deterrence Theory with Offenders: The Empirical Validity of Stafford and Warr's Model Article in Deviant Behavior 33(6) July with Reads How we measure 'reads'. Rational deterrence theories do more than omit important variables. Theories of deterrence focus on the manipulation of an initiator's esti-mates of the costs of war, the probability of winning, and the probability of retaliation through credible threats reinforced by usable military op.
deterrence: the public tort's legtimate function plaintiff is a governmental entity that has filed suit against a person for dam- ages caused by that person through her allegedly tortious behavior.the elements of nuclear deterrence theory.
It focuses especially on the credibil-ity problem inherent in nuclear deterrence, the way that con‘ icts of interest play themselves out in the presence of nuclear weapons, and the dynamics of brinkmanship.
It also shows that “ rational deterrence theory,” despite some. The failure of deterrence This article is more than 12 years old.
Daoud Kuttab. However, in his book Crimes of War, Michael Byers, a Duke University law professor, argues that the use of force.